Vic Event: The Art of communicating science: from cartoons to photography

15 July 2014
6:00 pmto8:30 pm

Communicating science relies on the effective communication of scientific information and its relevance. The art of communicating through the visual medium cannot be underestimated in its ability to cut through nuances of language and get to the heart of the ideas being conveyed. Photography, animation, illustration, art, video and film can allow us to  – see things that can only be imagined; to combine ideas that are at face value, unrelated; strip back the irrelevant to expose the heart of the issue; communicate what might normally take pages in a single image or via seconds of footage.

This event will consist of two parts.

1) At Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI) (5:45-7:30pm), this part will consist of a series of presentations by each of our panelists, James Hutson, Phred Peterson, Alicia Sometimes and Maja Divjak, followed by a panel discussion and a Q&A with the audience. Short pre-recorded interviews with Linnea Rundgren and Tony De Saulles will also be played. This is a public event, so please invite people you think might be interested, but seats ARE LIMITED.

2) For ASC members, dinner with the panelists will follow part 1, at Naughton’s Parkville Hotel (http://www.parkvillehotel.com.au), a short walk from WEHI. Your first drink is FREE.

Please see our Eventbrite event for more information and to register.

WA Event: An Evening of Food and Science

The WA Branch of the Australian Science Communicators invites you to An Evening of Food and Science!

Come join us and some of WA’s food science, wine and gastronomy experts to discuss, investigate and test the science behind food and wine.

Presenters include,

  • Emma Donnelly- 2012 My Kitchen Rules Contestant
  • Garry Lee- UWA Food Scientist
  • Vince Bligh- Greenpiper Wines
  • Joanne Castelli- Home Cheese Making Expert

The evening will kick off with demonstrations and presentations by our guest speakers, followed by the opportunity to network and enjoy nibblies and wine tastings.

WHEN?   6-8pm Wednesday, June 25th (Please arrive 15 minutes early for a 6pm start)

WHERE?   ScitechTheatre, City West

WHO?  Anyone! (18 years+)

COST?  $20 for the public and  $15 for ASC Members

Register online at https://asc-foodscience.eventbrite.com.au

QLD – ASC Networking Event: The Making Of Chemistry World

You’re invited to ASC networking drinks and an exclusive preview of ‘Chemistry World’, the exciting new interactive display currently under development for the Cube at QUT.

Hear ‘behind-the-scenes’ insights from the creators of Chemistry World and be one of the first to test drive this innovative science communication tool.

Your ticket includes drinks and canapés sponsored by Abfab Catering. The event is also supported by QUT Precincts and The Institute for Future Environments.

All event proceeds go to QUT’s learning potential fund.

Event summary
Date:
Thursday, 26 June, 2014
Time5:30 – 7:30pm
Venue: The Cube, level 4, P block, QUT Gardens Point
Cost: Early bird: $15 ASC members | $20 non- members
After 18 June: $25 ASC members | $30 non-members

REGISTER NOW

Questions? Contact seqasc@gmail.com

Event schedule: 
5:15pm: Event registration opens
5:30pm: Networking drinks and canapés
6:00 – 6:30pm: Main presentation and Q&A
6:30 – 7:00pm: Opportunity to play with display
7:00pm: Food/drink service ends, cash bar opens
7:30pm: Close of event

ASC taking LinkedIn to the next level!

Thanks to Kali Madden for this information and for setting up the new members only LinkedIn discussion group!

Did you know that the Australian Science Communicators (ASC) is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year?

As the Australian national industry body for all those who make science and technology accessible, many national and international science communication efforts have been stimulated and nourished by members of the ASC past and present in a myriad of ways.

We are a volunteer led Not For Profit membership association with branches around Australia and strong international links through board memberships and the affiliations of our members.

To cater to the varied preferences of members and supporters the ASC maintains multiple networks and communities alongside numerous gatherings and events, including biennial conferences http://2014conf.asc.asn.au/.

Our online communities, networks and resources include:

This month this LinkedIn group reached the 1,000 member mark.

To celebrate, and to help us better manage our multiple communities going forward, we have changed this group from a Members-only group (where discussions can only be seen by other group members) to an Open group (where discussions can be seen by anyone on the web and can be shared on other social networking platforms).

For those who have been active contributors in the group to date, THANK YOU! Your interest and contributions make this a valuable and noteworthy group to belong to. Any discussions you created before the group change have been archived and remain visible to existing group members only.

In future, all discussions created by this group are searchable and visible to anyone on the web.

You can learn more about different group types here: http://bit.ly/groupsoverview

In addition, we are excited to announce a new sub group for current financial members of the ASC. We believe this closed member-only group will support serious on-topic conversations that matter to the paid membership, whilst still allowing the broader general public conversation of non financial members interested in science communication via the open group.

All current members of the ASC will receive a personal invitation to join the new members sub group.

If you are not currently a member of the ASC but wish to be a part of the new member-only sub group and other ASC online communities then you may join online here: http://bit.ly/joinASC

We have not yet developed community guidelines for our ever growing community, but ask that for now you consider these ones from the Conversation: http://bit.ly/communitystndrds

We will use the guidelines above to moderate this group where appropriate and look at creating custom community guidelines in the near future.

If you’d like to contribute or comment please email linkedin@asc.asn.au.

Event review: PCST conference—Brazil inspires science communicators

Thank you to Christine Ross for sharing her experience at the PCST conerefence.

The first PCST conference to be held in Latin America focused on science communication for social inclusion and political engagement. As the ancient capital of Brazil and a former slave trading port, host city Salvador was a living, breathing reminder of the country’s colonial past. The contrast of a sometimes brutal history with the beauty and spirit of the predominantly Afro-Brazilian population was a perfect backdrop to the conference proceedings.

In a programme with many highlights, the stand out moments for me were other people’s experiences of the universal communications challenge; how to reach our most ‘difficult’ audiences. Difficult, or hard to reach, being defined by your particular topic or social problem.

Maybe it’s trying to explain birth control to a community whose dialect has no words for reproductive anatomy. Or provide role models in science for girls who have never seen anybody like themselves in a professional career. As Dr Elizabeth Rasekoala says, not many chemical engineers look like her.

And language matters. It influences access, ownership and how you get through. In some cases, not only are we speaking the ‘wrong’ language, we are also failing to comprehend a different world view. When we look up at the sky, you see stars in the daytime and I worry about being blinded by the sun.

Illustrating this point, Professor Yurij  Castelfranchi http://ufmg.academia.edu/YurijCastelfranchi discussed his work with indigenous communities more attuned to the environment than those of us whose senses have been numbed by ‘modern’ life may believe possible. Professor Castelfranchi notes that having data and theory does not mean that we can control the world around us or foresee events.  In my personal opinion, the compelling question for science communication is how do we reach those who by birth or culture or choice exist in an atmosphere outside of our own?  Of course, there is no generic answer.

Dr Suzette Searle focused on measurement, the eternal quest for practitioners and researchers alike. Presenting results from a recent survey of public engagement with science in Australia, Dr Searle revealed some intriguing findings, including just over half of survey respondents being unable to report a recent Australian scientific development.  Through the looking glass from New Zealand, Australia’s investment in research of this sort highlights the value placed on science in society at a National level. We are also watching for the outcomes of the Inspiring Australia project with interest.

Ross_Searle2014

Christine Ross, Dr Suzette Searle and colleague

 

The conference organisers are to be congratulated on a substantial, stimulating and enjoyable programme, examining the theme from many different angles. As always, this event provided a forum to reflect and debate the issues of the day. Many will be looking forward to PCST 2016 in Istanbul.

President’s update

Thank you to Joan Leach for providing us with the President’s update.

I’m writing this ‘on deadline’  for the editor of SCOPE as I needed her to ‘just give me a few more days’. The reason for this wasn’t entirely the usual pressure of work, but rather the moribund state into which I fell after the Commonwealth Budget was delivered. My worry stems from the emails, the social media, the analyses that I’m trying to get my head around. I have shaken this off and had the opportunity to talk with a range of ASC members. Of course, the budget plans are not yet finalised and there are many uncertainties. We’ve started collecting views and experiences of members on our new ‘members only’ LinkedIn pages; there are also some good links on the open LinkedIn group to impassioned responses from our science sector. Please get online, join us on LinkedIn and help me (and the rest of the ASC) make sense to any impending impacts (positive or negative) you see in your area/organisation/sector. I’ll be advocating as loudly as I possibly can for science communication and for science communicators.

In the short term, I’m going to follow some inspiring advice I heard last week at the “Women in Science Communication Breakfast” in Brisbane, organised by Pahia Cooper for the SE Qld branch. Professor Suzanne Miller, CEO of Queensland Museum and Director of the Queensland Museum Network very wisely talked about the need to keep pushing the ‘value proposition’ of science communication. The political and institutional contexts of our work change. That doesn’t mean that our work no longer has value; it means that we need to re-interpret our value for these changed contexts. She said that she makes it a priority that each week there is some ‘story’ about her work context that articulates the value of what her team does. Now, of course, ‘good news’ stories can make their way in the world quite readily. But, even complex and difficult stories about our work can articulate the value of science communication.

Her example was as amusing as it was instructive. When she was working at the National Museum of Scotland, they were moving a bit of their collection around. The ‘bit’ they were moving were the elephants and elephant skeletons and they needed to be bubble-wrapped and removed from sight. This caused quite a bit of disappointment to people (including determined 4-year olds desperate to see elephants). So, she took one of these determined 4-year olds to view the bubble-wrapped elephants. The boy was amazed at the size and asked (as you would), “how much bubble wrap does is take to wrap an elephant?” This question caused a buzz at the museum and around Scotland—it was a question that resounded across media, across ages, among a range of audiences—and it gave the Museum an opportunity to articulate the value of its collections even as they were being wrapped up and becoming temporarily unavailable. If you want to know how much bubble wrap it takes, Professor Miller gave the equation and promises a reference to a peer-reviewed paper.
Now, I don’t want to see science communication under bubble-wrap, but the key message I took from this story is that sometimes you need to reconsider your situation and re-articulate the value of what you do accordingly. I’m once again grateful to ASC members, in this instance for the inspiration and pep-talk that I received at that breakfast. In Australia, we have a seriously talented pool of professionals in Science Communication at all levels. That will not be difficult to communicate.

Event review: CRCA conference—Innovative with Asia

Thank you to Adam Barclay for sharing his CRCA conference experiences with us!

The 2014 CRC* Association Conference was always going to be interesting, coming off the back of a federal budget that announced $80 million in cuts and the cancellation of the 17th selection round. A back-of-the-envelope estimate for the cost of bidding for a CRC is between $0.5 million and $1 million dollars in cash and in-kind (predominantly staff time). With the original round-17 deadline barely a few weeks after the announcement, several bid consortia were feeling understandably grumpy. Fortunately, existing CRCs were not affected.

Sure enough, the budget cuts dominated conversation despite – or perhaps especially because of – the presence of The Hon Bob Baldwin MP, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, who attended the conference dinner and presented the government’s STAR Award, which recognises CRCs for engagement with small and medium enterprises to drive innovation. (Congratulations to the CRC for Sheep Industry Innovation, which won the STAR Award for work that is helping farmers improve flock management.)

Nevertheless, the budget talk failed to drown out some excellent presentations on the conference theme of Innovating with Asia. Highlights included Dr Thomas Barlow, author of Between the Eagle and the Dragon, who spoke on ‘Global Trends in Innovation – The Shift to the Pacific’, and Peggy Lui, Chairperson of the Joint US–China Collaboration on Clean Energy (JUCCCE), who presented ‘A path forward in the battle for a liveable China’.

CRC CARE Managing Director and CEO, Prof Ravi Naidu, with The Hon Bob Hawke AC

CRC CARE Managing Director and CEO, Prof Ravi Naidu, with The Hon Bob Hawke AC

Another obvious highlight was the Ralph Slatyer Address on Science and Society – named after the late former chief scientist who was the chief architect of the CRC Program in the early 1990s. The 2014 speaker was none other than The Hon Bob Hawke AC, former Prime Minister and school friend of Mr Hawke at Perth Modern School. Indeed, it was under Mr Hawke’s leadership that the CRC Program was established.

As well as reflecting on the history and impact of CRCs, Mr Hawke used the address to put forward his controversial assertion that increased uptake of nuclear energy is essential in the face of climate change as a result of greenhouse gas emissions, and the proposal that Australia is the best option for solving the major challenge of a successful nuclear program – the safe storage of spent fuel. Mr Hawke’s full address is available via http://crca.asn.au/.

Also of note, was the respect afforded to Mr Hawke from former political allies, particularly the Hon Tony Staley AO, CRC Association Chairman and former Fraser government minister. Introducing Mr Hawke, Mr Staley reflected that the Liberal Party was thwarted at several elections because the former PM was “too bloody popular”, and that regardless of one’s political stripes, Mr Hawke should be remembered as one of the country’s greatest leaders. In an era of at-all-costs political rancour it was a refreshing reminder that our elected leaders are more human than they sometimes appear.

*The CRC program is an Australian Government initiative that “supports industry-led research partnerships between publicly funded researchers, business and the community to address major long term challenges.” For more info, see www.crc.gov.au

Navigating the Animation Process (Part 2 of 5—Script Development)

Script DevelopmentFrom concept to screen, getting the best results.

by Adrian King (Animation/visual–fx producer, designer & artist)

Welcome back. If you missed the first stage (Initial Briefing) in this series you can read it here.

In this instalment we’ll have a look at stage 2. (Concept & Script Development). In stage 1, we defined the brief but not the content. The aim of stage 2 is to define (in written form) the content that will be produced in stage 4, and lay the foundations for stage 3 (Design).

2. Concept/Script development

With a well-defined written brief we can move into defining more of the details of the concept and script. This involves writing the script and gathering a few suitable visual and audio references. The script should be in written form only, formatted in a manner that clearly shows all auditory and visual elements to be heard and seen, in which order they appear, for how long, and indicate any special transformations to occur. It should include the following information.

  • All voice over and/or dialogue
  • Music & sound effects
  • Written description of key visual elements, designs, graphics, text, people, characters, objects or environments to be seen
  • All significant motion or transformations to occur

I like to construct scripts in a spreadsheet with four columns; duration, section, audio and visual.

If your animation doesn’t include any voice (for example a visualisation of a biological process for a stage presentation) the audio column might be empty. Getting the visual column filled in is still important. If you plan to use the animation as a backdrop for a verbal presentation, you could jot down some presentation notes in the audio column in place of voice-over to help time it out.

The script will also define the narrative style, (ie: informative, humourous, dramatic, children’s, educational, etc.)

Here’s an example of the beginning to a tongue-in-cheek animated video about quantum physics and mysticism. (If you’d like to make something like this drop me a line!)

DURATION

SECTION

AUDIO

VISUAL

5 secs

Opening Sequence

SFX: Building vibration and explosion

Open on black with a point of light in centre expanding and exploding into millions of stars (the big bang), leaving a star filled universe.

12 secs

VO (Eccentric professor): “Mystics and spiritual teachers often use analogies with quantum physics to describe their view of reality, but what do quantum physicists actually think about this. Is this a misappropriation of science or is there some common ground?”

Fly through galaxies with montage of symbols zooming past camera. Quantum physics equations, symbols, mystical and spiritual symbols from various traditions, waves/particle illustrations.

15 secs

VO (Eccentric professor): You’re about to hear ten quantum physicists de-mystify the most commonly used mystical quantum physics analogies with some nifty animated explanations.

MUSIC: Heroic
DEEP ECHOING VO: “The De-Mystifiers”

Cartoon style illustrations of the ten heroic quantum physicists reveal into the frame with their names and titles, followed by the logo.

LOGO: “The De-Mystifyers”

4 secs

Shot 1

VO (Eccentric professor): “First stop… Entanglement!”

Particles, people and spaghetti meatballs getting in a jumble.

GRAPHIC: “Entanglement”

So how do you get from the spark of an idea, to a fully formed script that fits within the duration? That’s a great question and whilst it can take time, it’s not as hard as it sometimes seems. I like to make a Script Plan first. This involves jotting down in bullet-point form all the key ideas/messages you want to convey without worrying about actual words for the voice-over. Then add to these a note of what we need to see to get the message/story across. Keep it simple at this stage and think of script writing as an iterative process, not a linear one.

Once you’ve got all the key message points and key visuals listed in either bullet form or a table, then come back and allocate each section a duration.

From here you can step back and adjust how much time you want to allocate to each section to make sure it fits the duration in the brief. The hardest part here is deciding which bits to cut. Most scripts run overtime on first draft.

Once you’ve worked out the timing for each section and established what points are in or out of the script, start writing the actual voice-over/dialogue. This non-linear approach can avoid spending time writing voice-over/dialogue that ends up cut from the script due to duration constraints.

This can work brilliantly as a collaborative process and bringing on an animation producer or scriptwriter can really help, especially if you’ve not done this before. For example there might be one person working on the key points, another on the actual voice script and another working on defining the visual elements. Involving the production team at this stage will mean they can advise you if the script is looking like it will blow the budget before you unnecessarily script wonderful ideas that are beyond scope. They might be able to suggest ways to show an idea in less time.

Here’s what the above script might look like as a Script Plan:

DURATION

SECTION

KEY POINT/MESSAGE

VISUAL

5 secs

Opening Sequence

Big Bang

Big Bang explosion

12 secs

Introduce concept behind video

Quantum physics symbols mixed up with mystical symbols

15 secs

Introduce ten physicists and tongue in cheek title logo

Humourous portraits of ten physicists and logo

4 secs

Shot 1

Segment 1 title: “Entanglement”

Entanglement graphic

For science communication animation, working iteratively on a Script Plan also helps identify anything that needs still needs researching to deliver a script that is both scientifically accurate and engaging. Science communication animation should be fact checked by appropriate scientists and researchers. Where Organisation/agency/stakeholder communication managers should also be included at some point in script development to ensure the needs of any organisations involved are met.

By this time you’ve probably considered what type of voice or narrative style will be best suited to getting your message across. You can find libraries of voice talent agencies online for reference. If it’s essential and the budget permits it can be valuabe to take the script through a professionally conducted user-group for feedback before you commit to production.

It can be useful during script development to view reference images for key visual elements that relate to the concept. This can help bring to attention things that we might not have otherwise noticed in words alone. Whilst it might start to trigger creative ideas, and there can be some overlap between Stage 2 (Script Development) and Stage 3 (Design), it’s not necessary to define the visual style until Stage 3 (Design).

KEY TAKE HOME POINTS

  • Prepare a Script Plan before you write voice-over/dialogue
  • Allocate durations for key sections in your Script Plan
  • Decide what parts must stay/go to fit your brief’s duration
  • Work iteratively and look for the missing research
  • Collaborative approaches work well
  • Consider testing your script on a user-group
  • Validate your script with scientists, researchers and others.

KEY ASSETS OF STAGE 2

  • The Written Script

In the next instalment of this series… we’ll turn your script into a fully formed visual production plan. Whilst a good script defines in written detail what we will see and hear, we still don’t know exactly how it will look. The goal of the design phase is to establish a set of shared expectations that animation production team/artist, client and stakeholders agree on. This includes schedule, storyboards and style frames.

I hope this is useful and that you’ll join me then…

Adrian King (Animation/visual–fx producer, designer & artist)
www.redboat.com.au
@adrian_redboat

(PS: You can send any questions you’d like answered about the animation process by logging in and leaving a comment below, or contact me directly at www.redboat.com.au)

Stories from the Interview Booth—Carbon capture and storage meets dairy farmers

Thank you to Michelle Wheeler for preparing this story from the booth!

 

As science communicators, we all love to share the latest exciting research and the stories of the scientists who make it their life’s work.

But what if the science itself was dependent on direct help from your audience?

A carbon capture and storage group has formed an unlikely working relationship with dairy producers in Victoria after discovering that the perfect place to research the geological storage of carbon lay beneath their farms.

Geologists at the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) began looking closely at the Otway Basin in south-west Victoria as a site for research in 2004 after an Australia-wide search.

The site had the right kind of rocks for carbon storage in addition to a natural source of carbon dioxide generated by volcanic activity millions of years ago.

The only problem was that the lush, green area was covered with small dairy farms.

CO2CRC communications and media advisor Tony Steeper said a lot of work had been done to engage the local farmers.

“We’ve had to bring the landowners with us on a journey, if you like, to undertake the first storage demonstration in Australia,” he said.

“They’ve had to understand how CO2 storage works, how we monitor it, how we know it’s safe, how we characterise the geology so that we’ve got confidence that it’s all going to work.

“That’s been a long process but they’ve been incredibly receptive and very positive.”

Mr Steeper said seismic surveys were particularly difficult for farmers because the scientists had to lay out a grid of sensors across their paddocks and deploy a vibration truck that stopped every twenty metres or so.

“They’ve got to move their cows, they’re worried about crops if they’re growing crops, they’ve got scientists running all over their land so it’s a fairly challenging thing for us to do,” he said.

CO2CRC conducted social research in 2006 and 2011, undertaking focus groups and telephone surveys to see what they were doing well and where they needed to improve.

“One of the things that we got right was employing a community liaison officer, based in the local community, that provides a point of contact for the farmers to go to,” Mr Steeper said.

The centre also distributes a local newsletter and holds public meetings and annual open days.

Mr Steeper said it turned out the scientists had a lot to learn about the dairy industry as well.

“We have had issues in the past where researchers have left gates open and so on and it hasn’t gone so well,” he said.

“Running pre-survey inductions for every researcher that emphasise two-way respect has meant the farmers are pleased with how we operate and the researchers have a better understanding of the requirements of the farmers.”